SOUTH BANK CORPORATION V MOSTIA CONSTRUCTIONS [1999] QSC 126
Supreme Court of Queensland – 11 June 1999
FACTS
Mostia served two notices of dispute on South Bank and referred a dispute to arbitration under clause 47 of the AS2124 Contract.
South Bank claimed that the first notice was not properly served and that the second notice did not adequately identify and provide details of the dispute.
Mostia claimed that it had provided the details in a conference and in correspondence to South Bank.
ISSUE
Did the Notice of Dispute served by Mostia adequately identify and detail the dispute?
FINDING
…Doyles Arbitration Lawyers provides the Arbwatch, a regular newsletter, highlighting new and important developments and cases in Arbitration law.
The subject matter focusses on the Australian jurisdiction, however we also regularly highlight international arbitral cases of import or interest.
We respect your privacy. Sign up below, it’s free and you can unsubscribe at any time:
