Warning: Undefined array key "options" in /home/customer/www/doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/theme-builder/widgets/site-logo.php on line 123
South Bank Corporation v Mostia Construction - Doyles Arbitration Lawyers
South Bank Corporation v Mostia Construction

South Bank Corporation v Mostia Construction

SOUTH BANK CORPORATION V MOSTIA CONSTRUCTIONS [1999] QSC 126

Supreme Court of Queensland – 11 June 1999

FACTS

Mostia served two notices of dispute on South Bank and referred a dispute to arbitration under clause 47 of the AS2124 Contract.

South Bank claimed that the first notice was not properly served and that the second notice did not adequately identify and provide details of the dispute.

Mostia claimed that it had provided the details in a conference and in correspondence to South Bank.

ISSUE

Did the Notice of Dispute served by Mostia adequately identify and detail the dispute?

FINDING

To continue reading this content, please complete the form below

End