Doyles Arbitration Lawyers | Arbitration Lawyers Australia
  • Profile
    • Approach
    • Skills and Experience
    • Clients
    • Privacy Policy
  • Services
    • Arbitration
    • Contract Documentation
    • Dispute Resolution
  • Events
    • Boardroom Briefings
    • Conferences
    • Seminars
    • Workshops
  • Resources
    • Doyles Dispute Resolution Practice Asia Pacific
    • Doyles Dispute Resolution Practice America
    • Casewatch List (2015 – Present)
    • Casewatch List (2010 – 2015)
    • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    • International Arbitration Cases
    • Published Papers
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Call 1800 888 783
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List

Lepcanfin Pty Ltd v Lepfin Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 155 (23 July 2020)

July 29, 2020/in Casewatch List /by Logical Assembly

Court of Appeal Supreme CourtNew South Wales     Case Name: Lepcanfin Pty Ltd v Lepfin Pty Ltd Medium Neutral Citation: [2020] NSWCA 155 Hearing Date(s): 14 May 2020 Date of Orders: 23 July 2020 Decision Date: 23 July 2020 Before: Bell P at [1]; Payne JA at [116]; McCallum JA at [117] Decision: 1.   Grant […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 Logical Assembly https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg Logical Assembly2020-07-29 06:12:302020-10-17 10:04:34Lepcanfin Pty Ltd v Lepfin Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 155 (23 July 2020)

Rinehart & Anor v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd & Ors; Rinehart & Anor v Georgina Hope Rinehart (in her personal capacity as Trustee of the Hope Margaret Hancock Trust and as Trustee of the HFMF Trust) & Ors [2019] HCA 13

May 20, 2019/in Casewatch List, News Board, Resources /by DoylesAr

This case highlights the High Court’s to give a wider interpretation to arbitration clauses and a vital importance to context in interpretation of arbitration clauses, and to be more willing to send parties to arbitration. The case also demonstrates the persuasive power of Mrs Gina Rinehart in all areas.     For a free PDF […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-05-20 03:57:122019-05-27 04:38:20Rinehart & Anor v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd & Ors; Rinehart & Anor v Georgina Hope Rinehart (in her personal capacity as Trustee of the Hope Margaret Hancock Trust and as Trustee of the HFMF Trust) & Ors [2019] HCA 13

John Holland Pty Ltd v Adani Abbot Point Terminal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] QSC 48

January 15, 2019/in Casewatch List, Commercial Arbitration Cases, Resources /by DoylesAr

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND JOHN HOLLAND PTY LTD (ABN 11 004 282 268) (Applicant) V ADANI ABBOT POINT TERMINAL PTY LTD (ABN 93 149 298 206) (Respondent)   FILE NO: SC No 2604 of 2016 DIVISION: Trial Division PROCEEDING: Application for Costs ORIGINATING COURT: Supreme Court at Brisbane DELIVERED ON: 12 March 2018 DELIVERED AT: […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-01-15 00:40:182019-01-15 00:45:34John Holland Pty Ltd v Adani Abbot Point Terminal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] QSC 48

Stepanoski v Aslan [2018] NSWSC 1160

November 12, 2018/in Casewatch List, News Board /by DoylesAr

This case highlights the approach taken by the New South Wales Supreme Court in assessing which Construction Contract is in existence and binds the party in the situation whereby a Cost-Plus Contract is in existence, however the parties’ executed a lump sum contract some months later and backdated it to the date of the Cost-Plus […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2018-11-12 22:49:482018-11-29 22:44:51Stepanoski v Aslan [2018] NSWSC 1160

MANN V PATERSON CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD [2018] VSCA 231

November 12, 2018/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

This case highlights the approach taken by the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal when assessing a claim made in quantum meruit as a result of one party accepting the repudiation of a contract made by the other party. The Court will have regard to actual costs when assessing the amount payable, however is not bound […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2018-11-12 05:25:502018-11-30 00:07:17MANN V PATERSON CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD [2018] VSCA 231

Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd v Rinehart (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 208

October 25, 2018/in Casewatch List, Commercial Arbitration Cases, News Board, Resources /by DoylesAr

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd v Rinehart (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 208 Appeal from: Rinehart v Rinehart (No 3) [2016] FCA 539 File numbers: NSD 916 of 2016 NSD 922 of 2016 Judges:  ALLSOP CJ BESANKO O’CALLAGHAN JJ Date of judgment: 15 December 2017 Catchwords: ARBITRATION  – stay of proceeding brought in Court in favour of arbitration […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2018-10-25 04:19:422018-11-22 05:31:04Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd v Rinehart (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 208

Wallera v CGM Investments & ANOR

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

WALLERA PTY LTD V CGM INVESTMENTS PTY LTD & ANOR [2001] NSWSC 96 Supreme Court of New South Wales – 1 March 2001 FACTS Wallera had franchised a carpet dry-cleaning process from CGM and Whistle. The process of electromagnetically dry-cleaning carpets (“the process”) that was used by Wallera and the use of the name “Electrodry” (“the […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:38:082018-11-22 05:30:29Wallera v CGM Investments & ANOR

Vince Schokman & ANOR v Xception Construction & ANOR

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

VINCE SCHOKMAN & ANOR V XCEPTION CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD & ANOR [2005] NSWSC 297 Supreme Court of New South Wales – 4 April 2005 FACTS Xception Construction Pty Ltd (‘Xception’) entered into a construction contract with Vince Schokman (‘Schokman’) for the carrying out of construction work at Stotts Street, Bilambil Heights in New South Wales. On […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:36:382018-10-21 22:12:00Vince Schokman & ANOR v Xception Construction & ANOR
Casewatch List

Villani & ANOR v Delstrat & ANOR

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

VILLANI & ANOR V DELSTRAT PTY LTD & ANOR [2002] WASC 112 Supreme Court of Western Australia – 16 May 2002 FACTS This proceeding involved an application by Mr. & Mrs Villani to set aside the award of an arbitrator for misconduct by failingto decide substantial pleaded issues between the parties. Mr. & Mrs Villani […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 78 200 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:34:532018-11-14 22:21:24Villani & ANOR v Delstrat & ANOR

Victoria Park Golf Club Inc v Brisbane City Council

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

VICTORIA PARK GOLF CLUB INC V BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL [2001] QSC 225 Supreme Court of Queensland – 29 June 2001 FACTS The Council was the owner (on trust) of land used for a golf course. The golf club operated a clubhouse on the land and its members had entitlements to use the golf course. During the […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:33:292018-10-21 22:12:00Victoria Park Golf Club Inc v Brisbane City Council
Page 1 of 26123›»

Phone: 1800 888 783

Email: doyles@doylesarbitrationlawyers.com

Pages

  • Profile
  • Services
  • Events
  • Resources
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
@2020 Doyles Arbitration Lawyers
Scroll to top
Enter your details below to subscribe to our Casewatch mailing list