Warning: Undefined array key "options" in /home/customer/www/doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/elementor-pro/modules/theme-builder/widgets/site-logo.php on line 123
Biotechnology Australia v Pace - Doyles Arbitration Lawyers
Biotechnology Australia v Pace

Biotechnology Australia v Pace

BIOTECHNOLOGY AUSTRALIA P/L V. PACE (1988) 15 NSWLR 130

New South Wales Court of Appeal – 30 November 1988

FACTS

Dr Pace was employed by Biotech as a senior research scientist. The letter of offer for employment provided that Biotech would “…confirm a salary package of A$36,000 per annum, a fully maintained company car and the option to participate in the company’s senior staff equity sharing scheme.”

When he was employed Dr Pace became aware that no such scheme had been established.

The staff equity sharing scheme was never established and Dr Pace eventually left the employ of Biotech. Dr Pace sued for breach of contract as Biotech had failed to provide shares under a staff equity sharing scheme.

ISSUES

Was the promise to Dr Pace of an option to participate in a non existent share scheme capable of being part of the employment contract?

FINDING

To continue reading this content, please complete the form below

End