Barter v Mayor of Melbourne

Barter v Mayor of Melbourne

BARTER V MAYOR OF MELBOURNE (1870) 1 AJR 160

Federal Court

FACTS

Barter contracted with the Mayor of Melbourne. The contract provided for altered works to be measured and paid for and further provided that “no claim will be allowed for extras unless ordered in writing”.

Barter claimed payment for, among other things, additions, alterations and extra works.

ISSUES

Barter argued that the additions and alterations, as distinct from extras, were not required by the contract be in writing.

Accordingly, the court considered the distinction between additional work which is within the contract and additional work outside the contract.

FINDING

End

Arbwatch Newsletter

Doyles Arbitration Lawyers provides the Arbwatch, a regular newsletter, highlighting new and important developments and cases in Arbitration law. 

The subject matter focusses on the Australian jurisdiction, however we also regularly highlight international arbitral cases of import or interest.  

We respect your privacy. Sign up below, it’s free and you can unsubscribe at any time: