Air Dynamics Control & Services Contracting v Durham & Anor

Air Dynamics Control & Services Contracting v Durham & Anor

AIR DYNAMICS CONTROL & SERVICES CONTRACTING V DURHAM & ANOR

[2005] NSWSC 366

Supreme Court of New South Wales – 22 April 2005

FACTS

Air Dynamics Control & Services Contracting (‘Air’) engaged Ishtar Painting Pty Limited (‘Ishtar’) to carry out painting work at the Chatswood Telephone Exchange.

A dispute arose concerning the quality of the painting work and level of indebtedness by Air to Ishtar. This prompted Ishtar to make an Payment Claim under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (‘the Act’) to facilitate payments.

Air submitted a Payment Schedule within the meaning of the Act on 16 December 2004. Ishtar then submitted an Adjudication Application dated 4 January 2005 but this was not received by Air until 10 January 2005, 14 days after service of the Payment Schedule.

Following that, the Adjudicator, Durham, determined the matter in Ishtar’s favour. Air submitted that the Act imposed a strict requirement that the Adjudication Application was to be received by Air within 10 working days of the Payment Schedule and that, therefore, the Adjudication Application was out of time and the Adjudicator acted without authority. Accordingly, Air sought an injunction restraining Ishtar from enforcing the Adjudication Determination and that payment of the Adjudicated amount should be paid into court as security.

Ishtar submitted that the Adjudication Application was received by the nominating authority and Air on 16 December 2004 and that the determination of the Adjudicator was made within the time frame provided by the Act.

ISSUE

Whether payment should be made into court.

FINDING

To continue reading this content, please complete the form below

End