Doyles Arbitration Lawyers | Arbitration Lawyers Australia
  • Profile
    • Approach
    • Skills and Experience
    • Clients
    • Privacy Policy
  • Services
    • Arbitration
    • Contract Documentation
    • Dispute Resolution
  • Events
    • Boardroom Briefings
    • Conferences
    • Seminars
    • Workshops
  • Resources
    • Doyles Dispute Resolution Practice Asia Pacific
    • Doyles Dispute Resolution Practice America
    • Casewatch List (2015 – Present)
    • Casewatch List (2010 – 2015)
    • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    • International Arbitration Cases
    • Published Papers
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Call 1800 888 783
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    Commercial Arbitration Cases
  • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    Commercial Arbitration Cases
  • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    Commercial Arbitration Cases
  • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    Commercial Arbitration Cases
  • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    Commercial Arbitration Cases
  • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    Commercial Arbitration Cases

Nu-Fortune Gold Ltd v Roxbury Trading Pty Ltd [No 3] [2019] WASC 469

January 13, 2020/in Commercial Arbitration Cases, News Board /by DoylesAr

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA CITATION : NU-FORTUNE GOLD LTD -v- ROXBURY TRADING PTY LTD [No 3] [2019] WASC 469 CORAM : ALLANSON J HEARD : 17 DECEMBER 2019 DELIVERED : 20 DECEMBER 2019 FILE NO/S : CIV 2354 of 2019 BETWEEN : NU-FORTUNE GOLD LTD First Plaintiff ECO MINERALS RESEARCH LTD Second Plaintiff AND ROXBURY TRADING PTY LTD First Defendant […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2020-01-13 23:13:432020-01-13 23:13:43Nu-Fortune Gold Ltd v Roxbury Trading Pty Ltd [No 3] [2019] WASC 469

Siemens v Bulgana [2019] VSC 771 (27 November 2019)

December 15, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases /by DoylesAr

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE COMMERCIAL COURT Not Restricted   S ECI 2019 4613   BETWEEN:   SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY PTY LTD (ACN 614 784 575) Plaintiff v BULGANA WIND FARM PTY LTD (ACN 162 201 569) and NEOEN AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 160 905 706) Defendants   PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-12-15 22:52:412019-12-15 22:52:41Siemens v Bulgana [2019] VSC 771 (27 November 2019)

Mur Shipping BV v Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse SA [2019] EWHC 3240 (Comm) (13 November 2019)

December 9, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases, International Arbitration Cases /by DoylesAr

Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 3240 (Comm) Case No: CL-2019-000209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT 1996 The Rolls Building 7 Rolls Buildings Fetter Lane London EC4A 1NL 13th November 2019 B e f o […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-12-09 04:34:522019-12-09 04:36:14Mur Shipping BV v Louis Dreyfus Company Suisse SA [2019] EWHC 3240 (Comm) (13 November 2019)

Georgiadis v Du [2019] VCC 1911 (22 November 2019)

December 3, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases /by DoylesAr

IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE COMMERCIAL DIVISION Revised Not Restricted Suitable for Publication GENERAL LIST CI-17-02188 Pavlos Georgiadis Plaintiff v Hong Hong Du Defendant — JUDGE: Murphy WHERE HELD: Melbourne DATE OF HEARING: 23, 24, 25, 26,30 September 2019, 7 October 2019 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15 November 2019 CASE MAY BE CITED […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-12-03 00:31:172019-12-03 00:31:56Georgiadis v Du [2019] VCC 1911 (22 November 2019)

Maco Group Pty Ltd v Johns Lyng Commercial Builders Pty Ltd (Civil Claims) [2019] VCAT 1815 (22 November 2019)

November 26, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases, News Board /by DoylesAr

VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION CIVIL CLAIMS LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. C4998/2019 CATCHWORDS Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 sections 1AC(1) and 1AC(3), interpretation of the Act to achieve its paramount object, section 7 meaning of “arbitration agreement”, section 8(1) – Subway Systems Australia Pty Ltd v Ireland [2014] VSCA 142 – Thiess v Collector of Customs and Others [2014] HCA 12; (2014) 88 ALJR 514 – PMT Partners Pty Ltd (in […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-11-26 22:28:112019-11-26 22:28:11Maco Group Pty Ltd v Johns Lyng Commercial Builders Pty Ltd (Civil Claims) [2019] VCAT 1815 (22 November 2019)

Pluto Shipowning Inc v Able Glory Maritime Co Ltd [2019] FCA 1836 (10 October 2019)

November 25, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases, News Board /by DoylesAr

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Pluto Shipowning Inc v Able Glory Maritime Co Ltd [2019] FCA 1836 File number: NSD 2023 of 2018 Judge: RARES J Date of judgment: 10 October 2019 Legislation: International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) s 8 United Nations Conference on International Commercial Arbitration Convention, on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards done at New York on […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-11-25 01:57:172019-11-25 02:07:41Pluto Shipowning Inc v Able Glory Maritime Co Ltd [2019] FCA 1836 (10 October 2019)

Application by Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd [2019] ACompT 1 (30 October 2019)

November 11, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases, News Board /by DoylesAr

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL Application by Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd [2019] ACompT 1 Review from: The arbitration determination by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission under section 44ZP of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) in relation to an access dispute between Glencore Coal Assets Australia Pty Ltd and Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd Catchwords: COMPETITION – applications […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-11-11 01:19:042019-11-11 01:19:04Application by Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd [2019] ACompT 1 (30 October 2019)

Rirratjingu Parties v Galpu Parties & Anor [2019] NTSC 77

October 13, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases, News Board /by DoylesAr

SUPREME COURT OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY RIRRATJINGU ABORIGINAL CORPORATION AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE RIRRATJINGU PARTIES (Plaintiff) V DJALU GURRUWIWI AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GALPU PARTIES (First Defendant) & GUMATJ CORPORATION LIMITED AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE GUMATJ PARTIES (Second Defendant)   FILE NO: 100 of 2019 (21934059) DELIVERED ON: 25 September 2019 HEARING DATE: 25 September […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-10-13 21:44:212019-10-13 21:44:21Rirratjingu Parties v Galpu Parties & Anor [2019] NTSC 77

Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd [No 12] [2019] WASC 285 (9 August 2019)

September 13, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases, News Board /by DoylesAr

SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA IN CHAMBERS   LE MIERE J: Summary On 21 December 2018 I delivered my reasons for judgment on application by the defendants and defendants by counterclaim in each of these actions: Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd [No 10]. I subsequently ordered in effect that the counterclaim in […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-09-13 01:55:532019-09-13 01:55:53Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd [No 12] [2019] WASC 285 (9 August 2019)

One Tree Community Service Inc v United Voice [2019] FCA 1309 (19 August 2019)

September 12, 2019/in Commercial Arbitration Cases /by DoylesAr

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA One Tree Community Service Inc v United Voice [2019] FCA 1309 File number: WAD 389 of 2019 Judge: MCKERRACHER J Date of judgment: 19 August 2019 Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – where dispute about payment of redundancy and recognition of service of transferred employees was referred to Fair Work Commission for arbitration – […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2019-09-12 05:05:062019-09-12 05:05:06One Tree Community Service Inc v United Voice [2019] FCA 1309 (19 August 2019)
Page 2 of 8‹1234›»

Phone: 1800 888 783

Email: doyles@doylesarbitrationlawyers.com

Pages

  • Profile
  • Services
  • Events
  • Resources
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
@2020 Doyles Arbitration Lawyers
Scroll to top