Doyles Arbitration Lawyers | Arbitration Lawyers Australia
  • Profile
    • Approach
    • Skills and Experience
    • Clients
    • Privacy Policy
  • Services
    • Arbitration
    • Contract Documentation
    • Dispute Resolution
  • Events
    • Boardroom Briefings
    • Conferences
    • Seminars
    • Workshops
  • Resources
    • Doyles Dispute Resolution Practice Asia Pacific
    • Doyles Dispute Resolution Practice America
    • Casewatch List (2015 – Present)
    • Casewatch List (2010 – 2015)
    • Commercial Arbitration Cases
    • International Arbitration Cases
    • Published Papers
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Call 1800 888 783
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List
  • Casewatch List
    Casewatch List

Trade Practices Commission v Commodore Business Machines

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION V. COMMODORE BUSINESS MACHINES PTY LTD (1989) ATPR 40-976 Federal Court of Australia – 3 August 1989 FACTS Respondent supplied personal computers to 150 dealers around the country, requiring a commitment in writing that the computers would not be advertised at less than the recommended retail price. They obtained legal advice that this clause […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:14:142018-10-21 22:12:01Trade Practices Commission v Commodore Business Machines

TQM Design & Construct v Dasein Constructions

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

TQM DESIGN & CONSTRUCT PTY LTD V DASEIN CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD Supreme Court of New South Wales – 3 December 2004 FACTS TQM Design & Construct Pty Ltd (‘TQM’) and Dasein Constructions Pty Ltd (“Dasein’) entered into a construction contract. Dasein served a Payment Claim pursuant to section 13 of the Building and Construction Industry […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:12:412018-10-21 22:12:01TQM Design & Construct v Dasein Constructions

Top Performance Motors v Ira Bern

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

TOP PERFORMANCE MOTORS PTY LTD V IRA BERN [1975] 24 FLR 286 Australian Industrial Court – 3 April 1975 FACTS Top Performance (Top) was the holder of a dealership to sell Datsun Motor Vehicles in the Gold Coast region. Ira Bern was the wholesale distributor of Datsun Motor Vehicles in Queensland and had granted the Gold […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:10:352018-10-21 22:12:01Top Performance Motors v Ira Bern

Tolfab v Tie

September 30, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

TOLFAB V TIE [2005] NSWSC 326 Supreme Court of New South Wales – 5 July 2005 FACTS Tolfab Engineering Pty Ltd (‘Tolfab’) entered into a sub-contract arrangement with Tie Fabrications Pty Ltd (‘Tie’) for metalwork for a residential development known as the “Oxford Square Project” located on the corner of Oxford Street and Pelican Street Oxford. Tie […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-30 19:09:012018-10-21 22:12:01Tolfab v Tie

Thiess Contractors v Placer Granny Smith

September 29, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

THIESS CONTRACTORS PTY LTD V PLACER (GRANNY SMITH) PTY LTD [2000] WASCA 102 Supreme Court of WA – 14 April 2000 FACTS Placer was the owner of the Granny Smith gold mine and in 1989 engaged Thiess to carry our open cut mining at the mine site. The original contract was a schedule of rates contract; […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-29 19:52:532018-10-21 22:12:01Thiess Contractors v Placer Granny Smith

Thiess Contractors v Placer Granny Smith

September 29, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

THIESS CONTRACTORS PTY LTD V PLACER (GRANNY SMITH) PTY LTD (2000) 16 BCL 130 Supreme Court of Western Australia – 16 April 1999 FACTS Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd (“Placer”) entered into a contract with Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (“Thiess”) whereby Thiess would carry out mining operations for Placer at rates based on genuine estimates of the […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-29 19:51:032018-10-21 22:12:13Thiess Contractors v Placer Granny Smith

Staff Development & Training Centre v Sec Employment Workplace Relations & Small Business

September 29, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

THE STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND TRAINING CENTRE V. SEC, EMPLOYMENT, WORKPLACE RELATIONS AND SMALL BUSINESS [2000] AATA 78 Commonwealth AAT – 8 February 2000 FACTS Mr. and Mrs Van Putten, Directors of The Staff Development and Training Centre, had been engaged in commercial training and consultancy services for up to 14 years. For the last 9 years, […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-29 19:48:352018-10-21 22:12:13Staff Development & Training Centre v Sec Employment Workplace Relations & Small Business

Minister for Commerce v Contrax Plumbing

September 29, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

THE MINISTER FOR COMMERCE (FORMERLY PUBLIC WORKS & SERVICES) V CONTRAX PLUMBING (NSW) PTY. LIMITED & ORS [2005] NSWCA 142 Supreme Court of New South Wales – 6 May 2005 FACTS The Minister for Commerce (‘the Minister’) entered into a contract with Contrax Plumbing (NSW) Pty Limited (‘Contrax’) for certain works to be carried out by Contrax […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-29 19:46:002018-10-21 22:12:13Minister for Commerce v Contrax Plumbing

Taylor Projects Group v Brick Dept & ORS

September 29, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

TAYLOR PROJECTS GROUP PTY LIMITED V BRICK DEPT. PTY LIMITED & ORS [2005] NSWSC 571 Supreme Court of New South Wales – 17 June 2005 FACTS Taylor Project Group Pty Ltd (‘Taylor’) entered into a construction contract with Brick Dept. Pty Limited (‘Brick’) for the carrying out of brick and block laying work at a site in […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-29 19:43:292018-10-21 22:12:13Taylor Projects Group v Brick Dept & ORS

Taylor Projects Group v Brick Dept & ORS

September 29, 2015/in Casewatch List /by DoylesAr

TAYLOR PROJECTS GROUP PTY LIMITED V BRICK DEPT. PTY LIMITED & ORS Supreme Court of New South Wales – 5 May 2005 FACTS Taylor Project Group Pty Ltd (‘Taylor’) entered into a construction contract with Brick Dept. Pty Limited (‘Brick’) for the carrying out of brick and block laying work at a site in Holden Street, […]

https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg 0 0 DoylesAr https://doylesarbitrationlawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/doyles_arbitration_lawyers.jpg DoylesAr2015-09-29 19:41:452018-10-21 22:12:13Taylor Projects Group v Brick Dept & ORS
Page 3 of 26‹12345›»

Phone: 1800 888 783

Email: doyles@doylesarbitrationlawyers.com

Pages

  • Profile
  • Services
  • Events
  • Resources
  • News
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
@2020 Doyles Arbitration Lawyers
Scroll to top
Enter your details below to subscribe to our Casewatch mailing list