HOME MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE PTY LTD V. DOYLE [1992] ACTSC 44
Supreme Court of the ACT – 13 May 1992
FACT
Doyle wanted to extend their home and Home Management through sub-contractors agreed to complete the necessary building works.
Doyle claimed that the contract was for a fixed price of $30,000 while Home management said the agreement was that the work would be done for cost.
ISSUE
Had the parties agreed on the price for the work and thus created a binding contract for the price?
FINDING
…Doyles Arbitration Lawyers provides the Arbwatch, a regular newsletter, highlighting new and important developments and cases in Arbitration law.
The subject matter focusses on the Australian jurisdiction, however we also regularly highlight international arbitral cases of import or interest.
We respect your privacy. Sign up below, it’s free and you can unsubscribe at any time:
